I need help interpretting the results of the miralax study...so could I get some intelligent wise folks to give their opinions.
Here's the article from the research board. Miralax study
And it can also be found in the newsletter:
Lack of Lasting Effectiveness of Miralax for Constipation MiraLax has been shown to be safe and effective in a 14-day trial for constipation. This present investigation was designed to extend the treatment and safety experience with Miralax and to evaluate any lasting effectiveness during a 30-day post-treatment observation period.
Methods: Study subjects met Rome II criteria for constipation and reported 3 bowel movements a week. They were treated with Miralax daily for 14 days. Treatment efficacy was defined by resolution of constipation symptoms as determined by the Rome II and stool frequency definitions during the treatment period. Thirty days after active treatment, 29 of 47 (61.7%) responded that they needed laxative treatment. Conclusion: Miralax relieved constipation in most treated study subjects, but during a 30-day post-treatment observation period, 61.7% had additional constipation treatment interventions.
As I understand it, the participants needed to use other remedies to help their constipation after the 14 day study was over. But what I'm not sure about is if they were also still taking the Miralax when the constipation got worse at the 30 day mark.
In other words, did they need additional "constipation interventions" (ie. laxatives)in addition to the Miralax at the 30 day point because the Miralax was no longer as effective? Was it only effective for 14 days as the sole treatment method?
Any input or opinions would be appreciated.
-------------------- ~ Beth
Constipation, pain prodominent,cramps, spasms and bloat!
Posts
Question about Miralax study in Heather's newsletter--Heather???
